Friday, January 14, 2011

What's the Difference Between a Bomb Pop, Rocket Pop, and Firecracker?


I''ve often wondered about this, but it's hard to come across a valid explanation.  They all seem like the same red, white, and blue popsicle.

I assumed that Bomb Pop, Rocket Pop, and Firecracker were just different ways of describing the same product.

Like a regional thing where maybe the East Coast calls it a Bomb Pop, but on the West Coast it's a Rocket Pop.

This isn't the case though.  They are technically not interchangable, but rather three similar yet distinct products.

Bomb Pops are the original trademarked brand of tri-colored popsicles made by a company called Blue Bunny.

Nestle's Rocket Pops and Popsicle's Firecrackers are knock-offs of the Bomb Pop.

Think of it like the Law and Order TV series: where Bomb is the original,  Rocket is an on par variation such as SVU, and Firecracker is Law and Order LA which everybody knows is a poor imitation of the original.

Sticking with that analogy, the crimes would have to be:  someone killing you for your Bomb Pop, sexually assaulting you with your Rocket Pop and having Alfred Molina partner with the Firecracker to solve an LA crime in a desperate attempted to make you watch an inferior show.

I know that I'd rather have a Bomb or Rocket Pop instead of a Firecracker.  All these popsicles for some reason are named after things that explode, but Firecrackers take it too far.


They feature a variety with an exploding candy tip.  This has to be someone's idea of a sick joke because  generally only porn stars like to have things explode in their mouth.

12 comments:

  1. this is the most ture thing ever. my mom bought bomb pops for ever and they are the best tasteing things and then she started to buy fire crackers and i yell at her when ever she does. she keeps telling me there no diffrance so i keep yelling. fire crackers taste like poop and bomb pops are just incredible

    ReplyDelete
  2. ok we just found this blog post (yeah it's 2014) and we think it's the most perfect description for the popsicles ever. EVER.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. Good to know that I'm not the only person who cares about the intricacies of Bomb Pops, Rocket Pops and Firecrackers.

      Delete
  3. I have never had ANY of them ..ever ..send I am 32 years old. My hubby introduced me to fire crackers and aim addicted!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. bomb pops are the originals and the best--firecrackers are garbage and they have the nerve to sue bomb pops saying bomb pops ripped them off

    ReplyDelete
  5. 45 and addicted to bomb pops...never had the firecracker...actually eating one right now at work...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Best Are Bomb Pops for me. When think of a Popsicle, it's Bomb Pops!

    ReplyDelete
  7. DIFFERENCE is Bomb Pops (the original) are made with milk (say MAY contain). FireCracker pops (popsicle) According to the FDA, they do not contain any of the most common food allergens milk, peanuts, eggs, fish, crustacean shellfish, soy, tree nuts and wheat. My son is severly allergic to dairy protein. Once at school he was given a Bomp Pop and ate 1/3 of the pop because he had eaten Firecracker pops in the past. Aprox 45 min after consuming only 1/3 the pop he was in the ER for 4 hours with IV and two adult injections of Epi-pen, Benadryl. Please never give a BombPop to a person with dairy allergies.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Another distinction... I just bought some Bombpops and the white secton is listed as Lime flavored. On Popcicle's Firecracker the white is listed as Lemon. I believe Rocket pops are Lemon as well.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Another distinction... I just bought some Bombpops and the white secton is listed as Lime flavored. On Popcicle's Firecracker the white is listed as Lemon. I believe Rocket pops are Lemon as well.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Bomb pops have a smooth softness to them as well. Firecrackers are hard and dookie. Ive been trying to figure out what the difference is that makes them soft.

    ReplyDelete